Volume 3, Number 9, Abstract 530, Page 530a doi:10.1167/3.9.530 http://journalofvision.org/3/9/530/ ISSN 1534-7362
Greater immaturity in sensitivity to second-order gratings than to first-order gratings during infancy
Terri L. Lewis
Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
[e-mail]
Vikas C. Bhagirath
Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Dave Ellemberg
McGill Vision Research, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Daphne Maurer
Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Abstract

PURPOSE. To study the development of sensitivity to first- and second-order gratings by measuring thresholds for the detection of motion in 3-month-olds, 5-year-olds, and adults. METHODS. Subjects (n = 24/age) saw two 15 x 15ยบ vertical 0.5 c/deg sine-wave gratings that were separated horizontally by a 5 gap. The gratings were added to (first-order condition) or multiplied with (second-order condition) binary noise. Randomly, on each trial one of the gratings was stationary and the other moved outward at 6 deg/sec. Amplitude modulation was varied over trials. For babies, we used the method-of-constant stimuli and data from 16 trials per baby to calculate two group thresholds, one for first-order gratings and one for second-order gratings. On each trial, a trained tester who was unaware of the side of motion decided whether the moving grating was on the left or right based on any reliable cues provided by a baby (direction of first look, of longest look, etc.). The group thresholds from babies were compared to the mean individual thresholds from 5-year-olds and adults who, on each trial, indicated which side had the moving stripes. RESULTS. Thresholds for infants were far more immature for second-order gratings (2.5 times worse than adults) than for first-order gratings (1.09 times worse than adults). However, by 5 years of age, thresholds were close to adult levels (1.03 and 1.09 times worse than adults for first-order and second-order gratings, respectively) and were no more immature for second-order than for first-order gratings (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS. During early infancy, the neural mechanisms that detect second-order gratings are especially immature compared to those that detect first-order gratings. By 5 years of age, at least under the present testing conditions, mechanisms detecting second-order gratings are almost adult-like and are no less mature than those detecting first-order gratings.

History
Received August 22, 2003; published October 22, 2003
Citation
Lewis, T. L., Bhagirath, V. C., Ellemberg, D., & Maurer, D. (2003). Greater immaturity in sensitivity to second-order gratings than to first-order gratings during infancy [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3(9):530, 530a, http://journalofvision.org/3/9/530/, doi:10.1167/3.9.530.
Keywords
None
On-Line Presentation
None
for articles that cite this paper
for related articles by these authors
for papers that cite this paper
Get citation
Get help with this






jov