Volume 4, Number 8, Abstract 306, Page 306a doi:10.1167/4.8.306 http://journalofvision.org/4/8/306/ ISSN 1534-7362
Comparable perceptual learning with and without feedback in non-stationary context: Data and model
Alexander A. Petrov
University of California, Irvine, USA
Barbara A. Dosher
University of California, Irvine, USA
Zhong-Lin Lu
University of Southern California, USA
Abstract

Learning was evaluated for orientation discrimination of peripheral Gabor targets (+/-10 deg) in two filtered noise "contexts" with predominate orientations at either +/-15 deg. The training schedule alternated two-day blocks of each context. 3 target contrast levels were tested. 18 observers received no feedback, yet improved both discriminability and speed within and across blocks. The initial and asymptotic d' levels and learning dynamics were comparable to those obtained for observers with feedback (1). For both groups, performance dropped at each context switch, with approximately constant cost (about 0.3 d') over 5 switches (10800 trials). In this situation, self-generated feedback seems sufficient for learning. A self-supervised model can account for these results via incremental channel reweighting with and without explicit feedback. Visual stimuli are first processed by standard orientation and frequency tuned units with contrast gain control via divisive normalization. Learning occurs only in the "read-out" connections to decision units; the stimulus representation never changes. An incremental Hebbian rule tracks the external feedback when available, or else reinforces the model's own response. An a priori bias to equalize the response frequencies stabilizes the model across switches. As accuracy is above 50%, self-generated feedback drives the weights in the right direction on average, though less efficiently than external feedback. Weights of task-correlated units gain strength while weights on irrelevant frequencies and orientations are reduced, producing a gradual learning curve. If the context shifts abruptly, the system lags behind as it works with suboptimal weights until it readapts, creating switch costs of approximately equal magnitude across successive context changes. Hebbian channel reweighting with no change of early visual representations can explain perceptual learning. 1. Petrov, Dosher & Lu, JOV 2003.
Supported by NIMH & NSF.

History
Received June 9, 2004; published August 13, 2004
Citation
Petrov, A. A., Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z.-L. (2004). Comparable perceptual learning with and without feedback in non-stationary context: Data and model [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4(8):306, 306a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/306/, doi:10.1167/4.8.306.
Keywords
None
On-Line Presentation
None
for related articles by these authors

for papers that cite this paper
Get citation
Get help with this






jov