Volume 5, Number 8, Abstract 341, Page 341a doi:10.1167/5.8.341 http://journalofvision.org/5/8/341/ ISSN 1534-7362
Surface interpolation and 3D relatability
Carlo Fantoni
University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy, and University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
[e-mail]
James D. Hilger
University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA
Walter Gerbino
University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
Philip J. Kellman
University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA
Abstract

Models of visual interpolation emphasize contour relationships. Although the role of surface-level processes has been demonstrated (Yin, Kellman & Shipley, 1998; Fantoni, Bertamini & Gerbino, 2004; for a recent review see Kellman, 2003), specific surface properties and geometric constraints that govern surface interpolation are not well understood. In this study we hypothesize that, even in the absence of contour information, visual interpolation can occur as a product of surface-based processes grounded on orientation information derived from image cues such as scale and shear disparities.
To investigate 3D surface interpolation we asked observers to classify pairs of planar surfaces specified by random dot disparities, visible through circular apertures on a fronto-parallel occluder. Surface slant was manipulated by varying scale and shear disparities. On each trial, slanted textures belonged to either parallel or intersecting planar surfaces with the same absolute slant. Observers made a speeded parallel/intersecting classification of texture pairs of different slants. Surfaces were presented in 20 conditions resulting from the combination of three factors: 3D relatability of the surface pair (relatable vs. non-relatable); tilt of the aperture pair (aligned vs. tilted), absolute surface orientation (20, 35, 46, 54, 60 deg). As in contour interpolation (Kellman et al., in press) observers performed better on the parallel/intersecting classification task when surfaces were 3D-relatable. The orientation of the aperture pair did not play a clear role. The effect of absolute slant was stronger on non-relatable than relatable surfaces.
Results support the notion that visual interpolation includes surface-based processes, independent of contour information and specified by the 3D orientation of visible patches. Scale and shear disparities of isolated textures provide sufficient information for surface interpolation.
Support: MIUR-COFIN2003 and US NEI EY13518

History
Received September 15, 2005; published September 23, 2005
Citation
Fantoni, C., Hilger, J. D., Gerbino, W., & Kellman, P. J. (2005). Surface interpolation and 3D relatability [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):341, 341a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/341/, doi:10.1167/5.8.341.
Keywords
None
On-Line Presentation
None
for related articles by these authors

for papers that cite this paper
Get citation
Get help with this






jov