Volume 5, Number 8, Abstract 934, Page 934a doi:10.1167/5.8.934 http://journalofvision.org/5/8/934/ ISSN 1534-7362
Biological motion versus coherent motion perception: The role of the cerebellum
Daniel Jokisch
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany, and International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
[e-mail]
Irene Daum
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany, and International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
Benno Koch
Department of Neurology, Klinikum Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
Michael Schwarz
Department of Neurology, Klinikum Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
Nikolaus F. Troje
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany, and Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Abstract

Perception of biological motion is a fundamental property of the human visual system. It is as yet unclear which role the cerebellum plays with respect to the perceptual analysis of biological motion represented as point-light displays. Imaging studies investigating biological motion perception revealed inconsistent results concerning cerebellar contribution. The present study aims to explore the role of the cerebellum in the perception of biological motion by testing the performance of biological motion perception in patients suffering from circumscribed cerebellar lesions and comparing their performance with an age-matched control group.
Perceptual performance was investigated in an experimental task testing the threshold to detect biological motion masked by scrambled motion and a control task testing detection of motion direction of coherent motion masked by random noise. Results show clear evidence for a differential contribution of the cerebellum to the perceptual analysis of coherent motion compared to biological motion. Whereas the ability to detect biological motion masked by scrambled motion was unaffected in the patient group, their ability to discriminate direction of coherent motion in random noise was substantially affected. We conclude that intact cerebellar function is not a prerequisite for a preserved ability to detect biological motion. Since the dorsal motion pathway as well as the ventral form pathway contribute to the visual perception of biological motion, the question remains open, whether cerebellar dysfunction affecting the dorsal pathway is compensated for by the not affected ventral pathway or whether perceptual analysis of biological motion is performed completely without cerebellar contribution.
This research was funded by the International Graduate School of Neuroscience (IGSN) of the University of Bochum, Germany and by the Volkswagen Foundation.

History
Received September 15, 2005; published September 23, 2005
Citation
Jokisch, D., Daum, I., Koch, B., Schwarz, M., & Troje, N. F. (2005). Biological motion versus coherent motion perception: The role of the cerebellum [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):934, 934a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/934/, doi:10.1167/5.8.934.
Keywords
None
On-Line Presentation
None
for articles that cite this paper
for related articles by these authors
for papers that cite this paper
Get citation
Get help with this






jov