Volume 8, Number 6, Abstract 220, Page 220a doi:10.1167/8.6.220 http://journalofvision.org/8/6/220/ ISSN 1534-7362
A Neurophysiological model of multiple object tracking derived from fMRI
Piers Howe
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
[e-mail]
Margaret Livingstone
Harvard Medical School, Boston
Istvan Morocz
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
Todd Horowitz
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, and Harvard Medical School, Boston
Jeremy Wolfe
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, and Harvard Medical School, Boston
Abstract

The multiple object tracking (MOT) paradigm is a powerful tool for studying dynamic attention and the nature of objects. However, surprisingly little is known about the neural systems underlying MOT performance. Here we present an improved method for identifying core brain areas involved in MOT, and introduce a novel analysis of effective connectivity among these areas. Previous fMRI studies of MOT employed a "passive viewing" baseline. This baseline is problematic, because it does not allow control of attentional load relative to tracking. We added an additional stationary baseline. Stimuli comprised eight identical disks, four moving and four stationary. Observers (N = 13) attended either to two moving disks (tracking), two stationary disks (stationary) or no disks (passive) while maintaining central fixation. Subtracting the stationary activity from tracking activity yielded a map of areas preferentially activated by MOT. This map comprised FEF, SPL, anterior IPS and MT+. Consistent with previous studies, using the passive baseline would have added posterior IPS and lateral postcentral sulcus. These last two areas are activated by attentional load, but not by tracking per se. Focusing on the first four areas, we employed a novel method to derive effective connectivity from their BOLD signal timecourses. We first determined the feed-forward connections between these areas by using prior anatomical information to constrain the Total Conditioning algorithm (Pellet & Elisseef 2007). This method allowed us to derive causation from partial correlations, while making minimal assumptions. We then reversed the procedure to determine the feed-back connections. This analysis leads to an improved understanding of the relationship between neural activity and performance. For example, we found a surprising asymmetry between ipsilateral and contralateral connectivity patterns, which could explain why behavioral studies have found tracking in two hemifields to be superior to tracking in a single hemifield.

History
Received April 22, 2008; published May 10, 2008
Citation
Howe, P., Livingstone, M., Morocz, I., Horowitz, T., & Wolfe, J. (2008). A Neurophysiological model of multiple object tracking derived from fMRI [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):220, 220a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/220/, doi:10.1167/8.6.220.
Keywords
None
On-Line Presentation
for articles that cite this paper
for related articles by these authors
for papers that cite this paper
Get citation
Get help with this






jov